DiVISiON BENCH v. Kumar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
3) With the above liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withctrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173
Judgment
Operative part
ORDER (24th Februarj?, 2009) The foilowing the Court was passed Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Shri DN Prajapati, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal flled by the appellants for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Flrst Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (FTC) Ramanujganj, Sarguja (CG) vide award dated07.11.2008 passed in Claim Case No.05/2007 with liberty of flling a cross-objection for enhancement of compensation in the appeal ofthe insurer ofthe offending vehiele. 2) Permission granted. 3) With the above liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withctrawn. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 3) With the above liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withctrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.