MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NQ. _ 2005 &SMKS S v. Narayan Verma
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173
Judgment
Chhattisgarh High Court Campus. Bilaspur Appellant Respondent M- 1ft CaseNo.. .of ^t.C&' L'y'j'sV^o-l+ftjTo Soi-H-t,c\v^i( Versus "^\OQriS! y-<vn V-£3r(r)a ^ &YS • Appellapt wjth^^iy S^n ^c^- \r-^^9 ^rr AdvQcate. Respond^nt't(Htfi-^b^^tiri IVui •^i.P^'^ii^gLU'i ^^'•^-a;'.?;,^';1 AWARD (Passedon 2-1^01 OOG& ) Parties file a compromise petition. The terms are just. We hereby record the compromise and pass an award in terms of compromise, and order that -appollant / responclent^Mo'3 shall pay to Fesponderrt / appellant a sum of Rs.-2-£i^zrsLi4_/i °^ lii_cuU;iun^by way of compensation togethet—with-fntei'est—®- ^pet—aimym-from—~—t&: 0/_ --sd/-.:^:.I (JudIceSaUshK. ihotri) Nlember-LokAdatat High Court of Chhattisgarti BILAS'UR ; Sd/- lignuourtofChhattis -^»,.BILASPUR
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.