MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL N0 v. Kamlesh Kumar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173
Judgment
Chhattisgarh High Court Campus, Biiaspur ^ M ^.Case No P-^. ^^ of ^0^ Appellant/s Arllt-5>m.a^m-i Versus Respondent/s ^A^y^OA-^-D^.' Appellant wrth / by Shri Respondent w -/ by Shri . f^:^.. ',.c^^^p Advocate Advocate AWARD (Passedon 2)^\]ic-b4 ) Parties file a compromise petition. The terms are just. We record the compromise and pass an award interms of compromise, and order that appellant / respondent^shall pay to 4-espondent/appellant a sum of Rs. _?j}_OWI-_l'^OM^/-by way of compensation, togethsT-mttrTwtefe€t=a-@—____________% -per anftym-ffem______=======-to--_ N&^ Sd/- '".« Sr"'A ljus8ffsh^lhi> Sd7- Member-LokAdalat^ HighlCourt "f Chhattisgarh Bilaspur
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.