Chhattisgarh High Court Campus, Biiaspur v. Advocate
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173
Judgment
Chhattisgarh High Court Campus, Biiaspur pvfir ^?/^ f^^-Case No._P'j?_L4q^:s -of_^b^ Appellant/s .IAA^^^J^- Versus Respondent/s :xur<ax ^, Appellant with / by Shri .QC Ve^^/sf Advocate Respondenfwi^/ by Shri N^-^^^s^ [\^ A^Adyocate J)>K^^ 4v^-p^^ AWARD (Passed on a-v \ oi 12-00^ ) Parties file a compromise petition. The terms are just. We Ihereby record the compromise and pass an award interms of compromise, and order that ap^eHafrt-/ respondent^shall pay to ^©spef^eRt-/appellant a sum of Rs. _3^_oHo/- ^aj^^6y way of compensation, tGQethcrwith intcrcot @- -_________-°/»-per annum froi K) 0:3 Sd/- ^mber:tok/5ff BIIASPUR Sd/- Member ~ Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.