Research Indian case law. Trace a case from lower court to appeal. Understand precedents. Work faster with AI.
Legal Research · Case Journey · Case Intelligence · AI Workspace
Retrieved, not recalled. Judgments are pulled from the indexed corpus before a word is written. The model only sees what was actually found.
Quoted verbatim. Passages are reproduced from the judgment text, with the case name and paragraph they came from.
Yours to check. Every citation is a link. Open the judgment and read the paragraph before you file. How verification works →
One matter, end to end: the facts as you would state them, the Supreme Court judgment the engine retrieves, and how that judgment reads inside a draft.
Illustrative, and labelled as such. The facts are fictional. The judgment is real, sits in our corpus, and is quoted verbatim — open it and check it. This panel is a static example rather than a live search.
“Our client is a civil contractor. The State department kept a ₹37 lakh security deposit. The contract was determined in March, the agreement says the deposit ‘shall not carry any interest’ and is refundable within three months — but the department held it for two more years. Can we claim interest?”
State of Haryana & Ors. v. M/s Jai Durgaa Finvest P. Ltd.
“On a proper reading of the Clause 19 it is clear that the Appellant cannot retain the money which is interest free, in perpetuity … If the State retains the security deposit beyond three months the Respondent-contractor is entitled for interest.”
Retrieved by statute-aware search over the indexed corpus, then quoted verbatim from the judgment text. Read the full judgment →
“5. Clause 19 of the agreement is a composite term. Its two limbs must be read together: the deposit carries no interest and it is refundable within three months of determination. The Respondent cannot rely on the first limb while defaulting on the second. As the Hon’ble Supreme Court held in State of Haryana v. M/s Jai Durgaa Finvest P. Ltd., the State ‘cannot retain the money which is interest free, in perpetuity’. Interest is therefore payable from the expiry of the three-month period.”
Shortened excerpt. The citation carries through to the filed draft.
Brief the matter the way you would brief a junior. We handle the research, the precedents, the Indian court format and the draft — from your first sentence to a document ready to check and file.
Plain language. No templates, no forms. Just the dispute, the way you'd explain it to a junior.
Party, forum, relief — like a senior's first consultation. You answer only what's needed, not a form.
The closest Supreme Court and High Court precedents — retrieved automatically, no library visits.
Court-ready. Proper format. Every argument sourced to a real judgment you can check before you file.
From the first draft to the filed document — AI legal drafting, case law research, bench analysis and your firm's own knowledge in one place. The hours you save are the hours you bill.
Guided AI drafting for 39 Indian document types — pleadings, written arguments, applications, notices and contracts, in court format.
Applicable statute, precedents, arguments for and against, and a forum view — from one plain-language prompt.
What a judge’s published judgments show — subject matter, how comparable matters were decided, and the reasoning relied on, with the paragraphs linked.
Full text of any Supreme Court or High Court judgment, with citations in and out, and a one-tap AI summary.
Save, organise, and share your firm's drafts and research securely — so nothing gets lost between matters.
Upload any court order — get a structured litigation brief covering issues, reasoning, strengths, gaps, and possible challenge grounds.
Limitation-period deadlines and hearing reminders, synced to your calendar so nothing slips.
Generic AI recalls case names from memory and gets them wrong. Courts & Cases cites only what it retrieved — real paragraphs from real Supreme Court and High Court judgments, with the case name and paragraph number you can look up before you file. No hallucinated authorities. No phantom precedents. Nothing that fails a check in court.
Indian court hierarchy, citation formats, limitation periods and drafting conventions — native, not retrofitted from another jurisdiction. Supreme Court and High Court judgments from 1950 onward, alongside 29,000+ statute sections.
Browse the corpus court by court: Supreme Court judgments, High Court judgments, or every court we index.
Litigators, in-house counsel and professional services teams work from the same matter context, the same corpus and the same audit trail — instead of five disconnected tools.
Take a matter from first facts to filed document: guided drafting across 39 document types, precedent research, bench analysis, limitation tracking, and a shared vault your team can work from.
Research a position end to end, review and mark up contracts, and produce a defensible internal note — with the authority behind every conclusion linked so your business can see the basis.
Tax, compliance and advisory practices use the same engine to check a position against statute and case law, then produce client-ready output in their own house style.
Published judgments by subject matter
Preparation you would do by hand, done across the whole reported record. For any judge we set out what their published judgments actually show: the subject matter they hear most, how comparable matters were decided, the provisions and precedents they return to, and the reasoning in their own words — each point linked to the paragraph it came from.
It is a summary of decisions on the public record, prepared to help you frame your case. It is not a prediction of outcome, not a scoring of judges, and makes no claim about any judge’s motives or impartiality.
Feedback from advocates, partners and in-house counsel using the platform on live matters. Shared with permission; names abbreviated at their request.
“I described a cheque-bounce matter, answered three questions, and had a written-arguments draft with the right Supreme Court citations. What took an afternoon now takes minutes.”
“Research mode is the one I keep coming back to — applicable law, precedent, and a forum view with the limitation flagged. It works the way a senior thinks.”
“The citations actually exist and open to the right paragraph. That is everything — I can verify the whole draft before it goes on record.”
Privileged work needs more than a good answer. These are the controls we operate today — each one links to the page that explains it, so you can check rather than take our word for it.
Every citation is retrieved from the corpus, never generated. Open the judgment and read the paragraph before you file.
Methodology →Outputs are drafting and research support for a qualified professional to review, verify and sign off. They are not legal advice and do not replace your judgement.
Terms of use →We operate as a Data Fiduciary under India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, with a published basis for processing and your rights set out in full.
Privacy policy →TLS on every connection and encryption at rest for stored matter data.
Security detail →Vault documents, matters and research sessions are private to you. Sharing to a team is an explicit, per-document action, and workspace activity is logged so an organisation can see what was run, by whom and when.
How sharing works →We publish where the judgment corpus comes from and what we do and do not hold about each document. No invented source links.
Editorial policy →Short answers, with a link to the page that sets out the detail. See the full FAQ →
Yes. The corpus is Supreme Court and High Court judgments together with more than 29,000 ingested statute sections. Court hierarchy, Indian citation formats, limitation periods and drafting conventions are native to the product, not adapted from a foreign jurisdiction.
Every citation is a link. Open the judgment, read the paragraph the passage was taken from, and confirm it says what the draft says it says. Quoted passages are reproduced verbatim from the judgment text rather than paraphrased. How citation verification works →
Authorities are retrieved from the indexed corpus before anything is written, and the model only sees what was retrieved. If a judgment is not in the corpus it cannot be cited. No system is perfect, which is exactly why every citation is linked for you to check before you file. Read the methodology →
39 document types covering pleadings, petitions, written arguments, applications, legal notices, contracts, legal opinions and case summaries — in Indian court format and grounded in retrieved authority. See legal drafting →
No. It is a descriptive summary of a judge’s published judgments — subject matter, how comparable matters were decided, and the reasoning relied on — with the paragraphs linked. It is preparation material drawn from the public record, not a prediction of outcome and not an assessment of any judge. How it is compiled →
Matters, drafts and research sessions are private to your account by default. Sharing to a team is an explicit, per-document action. We operate as a Data Fiduciary under India’s DPDP Act, 2023, with TLS in transit and encryption at rest. Privacy policy →
Start free, no card. Bring a live matter, and check the authority behind every line before you decide anything.
Free to start · Verify every citation before filing · Built in India for Indian courts