✦ Chhattisgarh High Court · 08 Feb 2004

Miscellaneous Appeal No v. Rameshar Nishad

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR.fC.G.l Miscellaneous Appeal No.. ^o^ /2002, APPLICANTS: CLA^MANTS 1) Roop Chand Sharma,S/o.Late Badri Prasad Sharma, aged about 53 yrs. 2) Smt. Gita Bai, W/o.Roop Chand ^' agedabout48 yrs. Both are R/o Shree Nagar Road Gudiyari, Tahsil &. District- Raipur(CG) ^l) RESP^NDENTS rON-APPLICANT^^.' />^.-' •">L ^ .^' ^ .2) ^^••-/ ^<<9^^ ^\^^9"^y^ ^Y ^ VERSUS : Raipur (CG) Rameshar Nishad , S/o.Ganga Ram Nishad Driver, Through Vasdev Bajaj, S/o Maghan Mal Bajaj, R/o.Gali No. 3 Faffadih, Tahsil & Dist Vasdev Bajaj, S/o Maghanmal Bajaj, R/s. .Galj No. 3 Faffadih, : Raipur (CG) Tahsil & Dist The National Insurance Co. Ltd. through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, G.E Road, District- Raipur(CG) Miscellaneous Aopeal under/section 173 Motor Vehicle Act 1988 ^^""" LOK ADALAT^ Chhattisaarh Hiah CourtCamDus. Bilaspur 'ft - -•-o.^.!'.^'v;:: 'm^ IJo-y i^\\rt--^^^^^^^^ _._^____^^_.__. /^^s^k^ ^s^^wW^ wfffi^ I ^^^^_^^^ Case No./vlAla£^^of^^s Appellant krei') U^v\d S^A>u^o^ Respondent ^N^1 <" yersus .A ^W^^xz^ ^ ic!ai!rtJ®a-'li®a coimipraffiis^ Detition. Th@ term® are J!UI;N thllwSba—S-S- Wa H^yitHy T^b'o-nQ iiniB ciQ^rppirotnniiiBe airiiO" pa^s -arj ^^CNl%l ResP8I!fl%t 8"tW|$&ri;,«^A^&I'^-a;1i!,^.,,,a, i^i^&,fer.; ^A'^JvAl^c^A, ,^^ , (Q^'g;ejr, \^. ^ ^^,..y^^^^^A^^^ J^3^^ '^^M ^JhialE pey t@ reai:.' v"'i^nt? app^ljiinir^, ausnn'of R^^.^^^^.^.^...^./'" hy wav ot [email protected]!!!iQi'~'' to(o^)th^r wlth liiit9r@3t: ll^p^iiijair^r^^l^olldant irhiait 'Q Jn p-r anouini ti-om'. „....,..,..... AWA^D ( Passed on o ^- 2- - -LOOL» ) Parties file a compromise petition. The terms are just. We hereby record the compromiseand pass an award in ^terms of comprbmise, and order that appellant/respondent pay to respondent/appellant a sum oi Rs. 30tuou/- " <$- by way of compensation together with interest /-n^^^ %^ per annum from. ^:_to. ^w^- .COP^ Meffiber-Secrstary Stato' -"1 '''iv'cas Authonty •^(C.G.) -.'•1 ..^.. SdA •L:,.:-.J; •'-' ^.f !ber-io!IA*"<'t ghcw^SbS^^ ^...~-'-.—..;- -^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge -Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Frr-P^r-^K, i...

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Chhattisgarh High Court, on 08 Feb 2004.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments