✦ Chhattisgarh High Court

Smt. Vimla Bai v. Sunu Ram S/0 Tapeshwar

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Smt. Vimla Bai W/0 Late Shri Tej Ram Aged about 30 years Dhaneshwari D/0 Tejram Aged 15 years. Vinod S/0 Tejram Aged 5 years Pankaj S/0 Tejram Age 3 yrs. Appellants No. 2 to 4 are minor hence through their natural guardian i.e. Smt. Vimla Bai All R/0 Village Chopan, P.S. Surajpur, Distt. Bhaiyathan, Sarguja (C.G.) Tahsil ^KESPONDENTS NONAPPLICANTS VERSUS 1- Sunu Ram S/0 Tapeshwar Caste : Harijan, Age : 45 years R/0 Masira, Police Chowki, Basdei P.S. & Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) Presently R/0 Gelhapani, School Dafai, Chirmiri, P.S. Chirmiri Tahsil: Manendragarh Distt. Korea (C.G.) 2- Oriental Insuraace Co. Ltd. Through: Branch Manager Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) Appeal U/S 173 Motor Vehicle Act 1988 valued at Rs. 2.10,000.00. XI-HC-78 3^'-:qT?n?Pr, »Tf1<1'l<»,Rtcll'M^< ../^A^.^2Jd... WTpTTaTm^'.""*"-'-'^'^'-^—4-"W! 3TT^?TCRqT (t^f^^T) sn^TqirR-ficb traT3n^TshH STaTWdf^rsn^T t)il<ltil41-l t|l4clTiFtei^<I<l<-<;l(, ^isrf^prsn^T

11.< None for t'ne appeliant. The matter is listed on defauit as oointed out bv office note :4/2/2006. Let the defauit be removd d within a week or else the appeai shaH be llabie for dismissal without ref^rence to this Court. y^ ilAtehia Jud&e P.T.O.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments