Judgment · High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The counsel for the revision petitioner has pleaded for leniency pointing out that about 10 years have elapsed since the date of the incident and the quantity involved is only 2.5 litres and so far the accused was facing the criminal proceedings and that…
Judgment
S.T.NO.750/1997 OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS, CHALAKKUDY CRL.A.NO.406/2001 OF III ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE, THRISSUR REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ AJI, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, KANNOLI HOUSE, KANJIRAPPILLY DESOM, PARIYARAM VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI AMJAD ALI THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON CRL.M.P.NO.5622/2003 IN CRL.R.P.NO.1334/2003 DISMISSED. SD/- K.R.UDAYABHANU, JUDGE 21/11/2007 \\TRUE COPY// K.R.UDAYABHANU, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Crl. R.P.No.1334 of 2003-B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 21st day of November, 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioner is the accused in S.T.No.790/1997 in the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Chalakudy, who stands convicted for the offence under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.
#2. The prosecution case is that on 15/10/1996 the accused was found in possession of 2.5 litres of illicit arrack.
#3. The counsel for the revision petitioner has pleaded for leniency pointing out that about 10 years have elapsed since the date of the incident and the quantity involved is only 2.5 litres and so far the accused was facing the criminal proceedings and that he has undergone considerable mental strain and that the family of the revision petitioner/accused is solely dependent for their livelihood on the income of the accused. In the circumstances and considering the long lapse of time, the sentence imposed for the offence under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act is modified to imprisonment till the rising of the court and to Crl.R.P.No.1334/2003 -:2:- pay a fine of rupees twenty-five thousand and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. The revision petitioner is granted four months time to remit the fine amount. The accused shall appear before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Chalakudy, on 19/03/2008 to receive the sentence. The criminal revision petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- K.R.UDAYABHANU, Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.