Judgment · High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU TUESDAY, THE 24TH APRIL 2007 / 4TH VAISAKHA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 2206 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.180/2007 OF OTTAPPALAM POLICE STATION APPLICANT/ACCUSED ---------------------------------- 1. MANIKUTTAN @ PRATHYUSH, S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, KULAMALI HOUSE, MANNANNUR P.O., VIA KAVALAPPARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. KRISHNADAS, S/O.KRISHNAN, KULAMALIL HOUSE, MANNANNUR P.O., VIA KAVALAPPARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. K.JANARDHANAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, KULAMALIL HOUSE, MANNANNUR P.O., VIA KAVALAPPARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.PRASUN.S RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PORSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE S.I.
OF OTTAPPALAM, POLICE STATION. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U.NAZAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R. UDAYABHANU, J.------------------------------------------------------B.A.NO 2206 OF 2007------------------------------------------------------------DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2007ORDERThis is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.The petitioners are the accused in Crime No. 180/07 of Ottappalam PoliceStation on the basis of a private complaint. The offences alleged are underSections 308, 506 (i) r/w 34 of I.P.C. It is submitted that only certainabrasions have been sustained by the rider as well as the pillion rider of thetwo wheeler involved.
#2. On hearing both sides, I am of the view that the petitioners are to begranted the order sought for.3. It is hereby directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners inconnection with Crime No. 180/2007, they shall be released on bail by theofficer concerned on executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two solventsureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the above officer. It isfurther stipulated that the petitioners shall appear before proper court andseek bail within a period of thirty days. They shall make available forinterrogation by the police officer. They shall not in any manner interferewith the investigation. K.R.UDAYABHANU.RV JUDGE.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 24 Apr 2007. The bench was K R UDAYABHANU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.