BAIL APPL No. 1595 of 2007 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 149
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU FRIDAY, THE 27TH APRIL 2007 / 7TH VAISAKHA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 1595 of 2007(A) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.7240/2006 CMP.698/2007 of J.M.F.C., MANNARKAD .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 ---------------------------------------- ASIF @ MINNAZ @ JINNAB, S/O ABOOBACKER, KELANTHODI HOUSE, MES COLLEGE PO., KUNTHIPUZHA, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P SRI.M.N.SAJEER RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD, REP.BY PUBLI PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI.BENJAMIN PAUL. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R. UDAYABHANU, J.------------------------------------------B.A.NO.1595 OF 2007.---------------------------------------------DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF APRIL, 2007.ORDERThe petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No.797/2006 of MannarkkadPolice Station registered under Section 143, 147, 307, 393 and 353 r/w.Sec.149of IPC. He is in custody.
Heard both sides.
It is hereby ordered that the petitioner shall be released on bail onexecuting bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like sumto the satisfaction of the court below. He shall not in any manner interferewith the investigation. The petitioner is directed that he shall report beforethe Investigating Officer on every Friday at 10.a.m. until the final report isfiled.K.R.UDAYABHANU JUDGE.kvs/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 149.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 27 Apr 2007. The bench was K R UDAYABHANU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.