Judgment · High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The criminal revision petition is disposed of as above
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The counsel for the revision petitioner has only sought for modification of sentence. It is submitted that more than 10 years have elapsed since the commencement of the proceedings and so far the revision petitioner was facing the prosecution and further proceedings. It is…
Judgment
Crl. Rev. Pet.No. 956 of 2000() ----------------------------- CRA.164/1997 of SESSIONS COURT, KASARAGOD CC.660/1996 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, HOSDURG .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------ POOVATHADY KUNHIRAMAN, S/O.AMBADY, MADIKAI, AMBALATHARA VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.M.THAMBAN SRI.K.RAJEEVAN SRI.DILIP MOHAN SMT.T.SUDHAMANI RESPONDENTS: -------------
#2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, HOSDURG. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI AMJAD ALI THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON CRL.M.P.NO.5122/2000 IN CRL.R.P.NO.956/2000 DISMISSED. SD/- K.R.UDAYABHANU, JUDGE 23/11/2007 \\TRUE COPY// K.R.UDAYABHANU, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Crl. R.P.No.956 of 2000-C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.660/1996 who stands convicted for the offence under Section 58 of the Abkari Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months on the allegation that he was found in possession of five litres of illicit arrack.
#2. The counsel for the revision petitioner has only sought for modification of sentence. It is submitted that more than 10 years have elapsed since the commencement of the proceedings and so far the revision petitioner was facing the prosecution and further proceedings. It is submitted that the sole means of livelihood of his family is his earnings. In the circumstances, the sentence is modified to imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a compensation of rupees fifteen thousand and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. The revision petitioner is granted three months time to remit the compensation amount. He shall appear before the Judicial Crl.R.P.No.956/2000-C -:2:- Magistrate of the First Class-I, Hosdurg, on 22/02/2008 to receive the sentence. The criminal revision petition is disposed of as above. K.R.UDAYABHANU, Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The criminal revision petition is disposed of as above
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 23 Nov 2007. The bench was K R UDAYABHANU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.