Dhudh Vyavasayik Sanstha v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Mr.Sale, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order in the instant writ petition by way of revision under section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petition…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8023 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.8023 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.8023 OF 2004 Proposed Sanjay Patil Sahakari Dhudh Vyavasayik Sanstha through its Chief Promoter Shri Dattatraya Bharat Salgar .. Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Amit Sale for the petitioner. Mr.A.H.Palekar for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 18TH OCTOBER, 2004 DATED : 18TH OCTOBER, 2004 DATED : 18TH OCTOBER, 2004 P.C.: . Heard Mr.Sale, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Palekar, learned counsel for the respondents.
Mr.Sale, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order in the instant writ petition by way of revision under section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. If such revision is filed, same may be considered on merits in accordance with law. All contentions are left open. 2 2 2 (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — s. 154.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 18 Oct 2004. The bench was D B BHOSALE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.