✦ Bombay High Court · 09 Dec 2004

M/s.Shyam Sales & Ors. v. The Thane District Co-op

Writ Petition No. 9621 of 2004D B BHOSALE

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The petitioner has impugned recovery certificate issued under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 vide order dated 4.10.2004. The petitioners have remedy of revision under section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Reserving that remedy for the petitioners to…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9621 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9621 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9621 OF 2004 M/s.Shyam Sales & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. The Thane District Co-op. Sahakar Bank Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Sameer Jamsekar for the petitioners. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 9TH DECEMBER, 2004 DATED : 9TH DECEMBER, 2004 DATED : 9TH DECEMBER, 2004 P.C.: . Heard Mr.Jamsekar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner has impugned recovery certificate issued under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 vide order dated 4.10.2004. The petitioners have remedy of revision under section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Reserving that remedy for the petitioners to adopt, this petition is dismissed. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — ss. 101, 154.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 09 Dec 2004. The bench was D B BHOSALE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 9621 of 2004). ← Search more judgments