✦ Bombay High Court · 31 Aug 2004

M/s. Dighi Agencies Pvt. Ltd v. The Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 3979 of 2004D Y CHANDRACHUD

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In case, the said application has not been decided, we direct 2 respondent No.1 to decide the Miscellaneous Application with the reasoned order within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Other prayers in this petition are not…

Judgment

Mr. Anil Subramaniam for the petitioners. CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J.& DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J, .... 31st August, 2004. P.C. :

1.

On mentioning the writ petition is taken on board.

2.

The petitioner in the writ petition has prayed that the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune Division, Sakhar Sankul, Shivajinagar, Pune be directed to immediately decide the Miscellaneous Application No.3 of 2003 under Section 148 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

3.

In case, the said application has not been decided, we direct 2 respondent No.1 to decide the Miscellaneous Application with the reasoned order within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Other prayers in this petition are not pressed. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

4.

The parties to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticate by the office of this Court. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — s. 148.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 31 Aug 2004. The bench was D Y CHANDRACHUD.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 3979 of 2004). ← Search more judgments