Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ALOK ARADHE, JUSTI
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Two CD CoPies ka1/eh_ vx* HIGH COURT DATED:0610112025 ) / JUDGMENT =:.\. \{9 S'IAl (. o 31 jll 2'n5 ITTA.No.619 of 2017 t) , -;'':" ,, v a ^-' t THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN #i.rld UL
Judgment
Cause title
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUS TICE J. SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No: 619 ot2017 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act 1961 against the order dated 21-12-2O16 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad in l.T'A-No.643lHydl2015 for Assessment Year 2011-2012 preferred against the order dated 17-03-2015 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vl, Hyderabad in I T A No' 01384/DCIT 6(1) iCIT(A)-Vlt2O14'15 preferred against the Order dated 2743- 2014 passed in PAN / GIR No.AABTRT8'19K on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome-Tax, Circle - 6 (1), Hyderabad. Between: The Pr. Commissioner of lncome-tax-6, Hyderabad. ...AppellanUAPPellant AND M/s Rukmini Devi Trust, 8-2-293t82tN549lB' Jubilee Hills Co-op Housing Society, Road no.27, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 032. ...RespondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellant:
Ms. B. Sapna Reddy, Standing Counsel representing fUr.,lt.V. Prasad, Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Department Counsel for the Respondent: Sri G.V.N. Hari The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE THE CIIIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE J.SR.EENTV AS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No .619 of 2ot7 t
JUDGMENT:
per Lhe Hon, bte the Chief Justice Atok Aradhel Ms. IS.Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standing Counsel representing Mr. J.V.prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department for the appellant.
2. Learneri counsel for the appellant seeks leave oi this Court to withdraw the appeal in the light of the Circular No.O9/202a, dated 17.09.2024, with the liberty to revive the same in case the subject matter of the appeal jalls in any of the e>:ceptions provided in the Circu lar No.S/2024 dated 15.O3.2'024.
Operative part
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the liberty as prayed for. 2 Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR S TION OFFICER \ To,
The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal' Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad'
The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vl, Hyderabad'
The Deputy Commissioner of lncome-Tax, Circle - 6 (1), Hyderabad'
One CC to Mr. J.V. Prasad, Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Department loPUCl
One CC to Sri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD CoPies ka1/eh_ vx* HIGH COURT DATED:0610112025 ) / JUDGMENT =:.\. \{9 S'IAl (. o 31 jll 2'n5 ITTA.No.619 of 2017 t) , -;'':" ,, v a ^-' t THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN #i.rld UL
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Tax Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.