✦ Telangana High Court

M/S Sri Balaji Trading Company, Secunderabad v. The Commissioner of lncome -Tax-V, Hyderabad. Andhra Pradesh

ALOK ARADHE

Case at a glance

Bench
ALOK ARADHE

Judgment

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUN AL APPEAL NO: 176 OF 2008 Appeal under section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act-196't, against the orders ilited: 15-09-2006 passed in l.T.A.Nos. 735lHydl2oO5 for Assessment Year 1993-94 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 28 03 20-05 passed in Ap-peal No. 0224&225tAcff-10(1)ClT(ar-V112004-OS on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeats) - Vl, 12th Floor, Gagan Vihar, M.J.Road, Hyderabad preferred against the Ordbr daied 31-03-1998 passed in GIR No. 5-302, on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle &(2) INV, Hyderabad. Between: M/S Sri Balaji Trading Company, Secunderabad. AND The Commissioner of lncome -Tax-V, Hyderabad. Andhra Pradesh ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K.NEERAJA, Learned Counsel representing SRI. K K VISWANATHAM Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following: ORDER THE HO BLE THE CHIEF IUSTICE AL KARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE I,SREENIVAS RAO I.T.T.A.No .17 6 of 2008 UD MENT (l'r rht l lc,,t'brz the ChieiJu:hv Alak Aradhe) NIs. I.-.Neeraia, lcatned counsel represenring N'Ir. lt.I{.\/isuranatham, Iearned counsel f<>r the appellant/asserisee, submits that she has flo instrlrctions to argue the matt,3l 'fhe app,:al is, therefore, dismissed for non-proseculion No cos ts As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand clo sed //TRUE COPY// Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR t\ . SECTIoN oFFIcER The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench ,A,, The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - Vl, j2th Floor, dagan Vihar, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. The Assistant Cr:mmissioner of Income Tax Circle & (2) lNV, Hyderabad. One CC to SRl. K K VISWANATHAM, Advocate tOpUCI Two CD Copies Hyderabad. To 1 2 J. 4. 5 PR/gh -iWx. 1\ HIGH COURT DATED:061A112025 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.176 of 2008 1 J c o r€ ,l I\ r.la 5 7- a+, ,r (-{ DISMISSING FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS \ry

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments