M/S Sri Balaji Trading Company, Secunderabad v. The Commissioner of lncome -Tax-V, Hyderabad. Andhra Pradesh
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ALOK ARADHE
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUN AL APPEAL NO: 176 OF 2008 Appeal under section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act-196't, against the orders ilited: 15-09-2006 passed in l.T.A.Nos. 735lHydl2oO5 for Assessment Year 1993-94 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 28 03 20-05 passed in Ap-peal No. 0224&225tAcff-10(1)ClT(ar-V112004-OS on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeats) - Vl, 12th Floor, Gagan Vihar, M.J.Road, Hyderabad preferred against the Ordbr daied 31-03-1998 passed in GIR No. 5-302, on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle &(2) INV, Hyderabad. Between: M/S Sri Balaji Trading Company, Secunderabad. AND The Commissioner of lncome -Tax-V, Hyderabad. Andhra Pradesh ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K.NEERAJA, Learned Counsel representing SRI. K K VISWANATHAM Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following: ORDER THE HO BLE THE CHIEF IUSTICE AL KARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE I,SREENIVAS RAO I.T.T.A.No .17 6 of 2008 UD MENT (l'r rht l lc,,t'brz the ChieiJu:hv Alak Aradhe) NIs. I.-.Neeraia, lcatned counsel represenring N'Ir. lt.I{.\/isuranatham, Iearned counsel f<>r the appellant/asserisee, submits that she has flo instrlrctions to argue the matt,3l 'fhe app,:al is, therefore, dismissed for non-proseculion No cos ts As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand clo sed //TRUE COPY// Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR t\ . SECTIoN oFFIcER The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench ,A,, The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - Vl, j2th Floor, dagan Vihar, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. The Assistant Cr:mmissioner of Income Tax Circle & (2) lNV, Hyderabad. One CC to SRl. K K VISWANATHAM, Advocate tOpUCI Two CD Copies Hyderabad. To 1 2 J. 4. 5 PR/gh -iWx. 1\ HIGH COURT DATED:061A112025 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.176 of 2008 1 J c o r€ ,l I\ r.la 5 7- a+, ,r (-{ DISMISSING FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS \ry
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.