3418 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY v. State of Andhra Pradesh2
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ALOK ARADHE
Outcome
Disposed of
Therefore, the writ appeal is disposed of rvith the
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Therefore, the writ appeal is disposed of rvith the liberty to the appellants to seek review of the order dated 09.O7 .2O2.+ passed by the learned Single Judge. Miscr:llaneous applications pending, if anrz. shall stand clost:d. However, there shall be no order as to…
Judgment
dated O910712O24 in W.P.No.16824 of 2024 on the file of the High Court. Between: Rl/o. H.No. 5-9-1069, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad. H,No. 10-5-3/2/1/E, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. R/o. H.No. 19-5-19, Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad. 1 $mt. Ruqia Fatima, W/o. Kaleemuddin Quadri, Age 71 years, Occ. Housewife, 2. Smt. Ameena Fatima, Wio. Hamid Hussaini, Age 68 years, Occ Housewife, 3. Smt. Zaihara Fatima, Wo. Laic Md. lkbal, Age 66 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. 4. Smt. Sugara Fatima, Wci. Nadeem, Age 61 years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o. H.No. 5. Syed Akbar Nizamuddin Hssaini, S/o Late. Syed Qutubuddin Hussaini, Age 67 years, Occupation Business, Fl/o. H.No.5-6-535, Nampally, Hyderabad. 6. Syed Alimuddin Hussaini, S/o, Late Syed Qutubuddin Hussaini, Age 57 years, 7. Syed Samsamuddin Hussaini, S/o Late Syed Hashim Hussaini age 48 years, Occ Business, Fl/o H.No. 5-5-535, Nampally, Hyderabad 8-2-3991N2, Road No.S, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Occupation Business, Rl/o H.No.5-6-530, Nampally, Hyderabad
Syed Ethashamuddin Hussaini, S/o. Late Syed Hashim Hussaini, Age 43 9. Smt, lmtiyaz Banu, Wo. Syed Alahaq Ahmed, Age 47 years, Occ Housewife, years, Occ Business, Rio. H.No.5-6-530, Nampally, Hyderabad. R/o. H.No. 5-6-530, Nampally. Hyderabad
Syed Sabir Hussaini, S/o. Late Syed Zainulabeddin Hussaini, Age 59 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. H.No. 20-4-1162, Charminar, Hyderabad 11. Smt. Akber Fatima, Wo. Syed Akber Nizamuddin Hussaini, Age 57 years, Occ Housewife Daughter of Late Syed Zainulabeddin Hussaini, Rl/o. Nampally, Hyderabad. '
Smt. Moinunnisa Begum, Wo. Mohd. Khaleque_Age 68 years, Occ Housewife legal heirs of Late Azizunnisa Begum Fl/o Masab Tank Hyderabad. '
Smt. Shamasunnisa Begum, Wlo. Zahed Ali Khan Age 59 years. Occ Housewife, Legal heirs of Late Azizunnisa Bmuin Rl/o Masab Tank, Hyderabad
Zahid Ali Khan, S/o Late Abid Ali Khan. Age 71 yeas Occ Business, legal heirs of Late Muneerunnisa Begum, R/o. Mir Alam Tank Hyderabad.
Shahid Ali Khan, Sio Late Abid Ali Khan, Age 68 years Occ. Business, legal heirs of Late Muneerunnisa Begum, Fl/o. Mir Alam Tank Hyderabad.
Smt. Sabera Fatima, D/o. Late Abdul Khader, Age 57 years. Occ Housewife, legal heir of Late Butul Fatima Rl/o. Nampally. Hyderabad. lT.Sakeena Fatima, Wo Shaik Osman, age 42 years. Occupation Housewife, Fl/o H.No. 5-6-530, Nampally, Hyderabad Petitiolers are represented their GPA Holder Syed Bandenar#z Hussiani, S/o Syed Zainulabl.ddin Hussaini, Age 38 years Oc-c. Business Rto B-2-602138t2, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-
Syed _Bandenawz Hussiani, S/o Syed Zainulabeddin Hussaini Age 3g years Occ. Businesrs R/o 8-2-60213812, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills H,ydeiabad. ' ...PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/THIRD PARTY AND
Alugu. Nikithl_W/o. A.Vinay Reddy, Aged about 26 years, Occ: House wife, R/o. H.No 2-62 QattuggQem, Chiriaraval palle, Bibinagar, yadadri Byhuvangiri District - 508126.
The State of 1'elangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue (Registration. and Stamps) Depdrtment, Di B R RmbeOfar Telangana State Secretariat Hyderabad.
The District Registrar, Ranoa Reddv.
The Sub Registrar, Pedda Amberptlt Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: SRt SAGARTKA LOYA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI RAJESH MADDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 4: SRl MURALTDHAR REDDY KATRAM cp FoR REVENUE (STAMPS & REGISTRATTON) The Court made the following: JUDGMENT TIIE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO AND UIRIT APPEAL No.9 of 2o25 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'bLe th.e CtLbf Jlstrce Alok Aradhe) Ms. Sagarika Loya, learned counsel for the appellants. Mr. Rajesh Maddy, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. Mr. Muralidhar Reddy Katram, learned Government Pleader Revenue (Stamps and Registration) for the respondents No.2 to 4.
2. This intra court appeal is filed against the order dated 09.07.2024 passed in W.P.No. 16a24 of 2024.
3. Admittedly, the appellants are not parties to the order which has been impugned in this intra court appeal. The aforesaid order, therefore, does not bind the appellants. l t 2 r1
4. In view of law laid down by the Supreme Court in shivdev singh v. state of punjabr as u,.er as Division Bench of this Court in palavalasa padmanabham v. State of Andhra Pradesh2, the appellants haver the rr:medy of review avzLilable before the learned Single Judge.
Operative part
Therefore, the writ appeal is disposed of rvith the liberty to the appellants to seek review of the order dated 09.O7 .2O2.+ passed by the learned Single Judge. Miscr:llaneous applications pending, if anrz. shall stand clost:d. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 3Sc ALD 1909 44e (DB) 'AJ220R 196 03 (4) //TRUE COPY// To 1 2 3 4 PSK. LS trf^;,tit",g,,;f,IT;,Ht-,:"*T[d:-H.-- {lr ;P,l{i+Rtb?,5,"Ii[ sEcrtor'r oil"=* RATION), High Court \ HIGH COURT DATED:0610112025 ) JUDGMENT WA.No.9 ot 2025 A. c C) '-- '=t:' .i.i l Ht s14 /6 02 dil lgn 1-^ \./.-^,...,- - 1 -*---,: -; * (.' > ?, c)i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS @#v
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.