Commissioner of lncome Tax_V, lT Towers, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad v. M/s Jagadamba pearls Dealers
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ALOK ARA DHE
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome-Tax, Cential 4. One CC to Mr. J.V.prasad, Standing Counsel for lncome frx'Oepartmert l. 9nu 99 !o Sl A.V. Raghu Ram, Advocate [opUC] 6. Two CD Copies _ 4, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. loPUCl -Circle To, @^ HIGH COURT DATED:0610112025 JUDGMENT lTTA.No.558…
Judgment
Cause title
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act 1961 against the order dated 17-06-20'13 0n the fire of the rncome Tax Apperate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad in l.T.A.No.91 lHydl2l12 for Assessment Year 2oo}'2oog preferred against the order dated 30-12-20.r 1 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)_Vll, Hyderabad in l'T'A'No 1244rDcrr cc-4icrr(A)-Vr2o1o-11 preferred against the order dated 31-12-2010 passed in pAN / crR No.[REDACTED] on the fire of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome_Tax, Central Circle _ 4, Hyderabad. Between: Commissioner of lncome Tax_V, lT Towers, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad AND ...Appellant
M/s Jagadamba pearls Dealers, 7_2_155, pot Market, Secunderabad Counsel for the Appellant: Ms._B. S-apna Reddy, Standing Counsel representing
Mr. J.V.prasad, Standing Coun""i foiln"ori" f* O"partment Counsel for the Respondent: Sri A.V. Raghu Ram The Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT ...
Respondent 7 , I THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARA.DHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.558 of 2O13 JUDGMENT: (l'er the lloi'ble the Chrcf Justrce Alok Arodhe) Ms. B,Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standing Counsel representing Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Co,rnsel for Income Tax Department frrr the appellant
Operative part
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to wittLclraw the appeal in the light of the Crrcular No.O9/2O2a, dated 17.09.2024, with the liberty to revive the same in r:ase the subject matter of the appeal falls in any of the exceptions provided in the Circular No.S 12024 dated 15.03.21024. /) Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the libertY as PraYed for I '1 2 ',; Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shail stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. K. SRIN]VASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER 'l . The hcome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)_Vll, Hyderabad.
The Deputy Commissioner of lncome-Tax, Cential 4. One CC to Mr. J.V.prasad, Standing Counsel for lncome frx'Oepartmert l. 9nu 99 !o Sl A.V. Raghu Ram, Advocate [opUC] 6. Two CD Copies _ 4, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. loPUCl -Circle To, @^ HIGH COURT DATED:0610112025 JUDGMENT lTTA.No.558 of 2013 c* ST,Af F 7 z t-) e ,) L) 31 J[]. ?12-q -.'' .a ),.\: 1): _. ,,', l:-,-r.--'t'-" THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN 0,K W
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Tax Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.