The Commissioner of lncome Tax-lll, l.T.Towers, A'C'Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad v. BGS-SGS-Soma Joint Venture
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordrngly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordrngly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the liberty as prayed for. 2 4\. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stald closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// sd/-K sR+HYt?&ElR SEC N OFFICER To 1 .…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HON'BLE SRI JU STICE J. SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBU NAL AP PEAL No:32of2O12 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act 1961 against the order dated 08-09-2009 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad in l.T.A.No.399/Hyd/2008 for Assessment Year 2O04-2OO5 preferred against the order daled 'l 5-01-2008 on the file of the commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lV, Hyderabad in Appeal No. 298/|TO.W.6(3yClT(A)-lv/06-07 preferred against the order dated 28-12-2006 passed in PAN / GIR No. AAA 3718 F tB-349 on the file of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward-6(3), Hyderabad. Between: The Commissioner of lncome Tax-lll, l.T.Towers, A'C'Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. ...APPellant
AND BGS-SGS-Soma Joint Venture , B-2-623t5t1,14, Avenue 4, Banjara nills, \r.. Hyderabad. ...ResPondent
Counsel for the Appellant:
Ms. B. Sapna Reddy, Standing Counsel representing
Mr. .t.V. Prasad, Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Department Counsel for the Respondent: Sri R. Raghunandan The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT ,1 THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO AND INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.32 of 2012 \
JUDGMENT:
!'er the IIon'bIe the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) Ms. B.Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Sternding Counsel representing Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to urithdraw the appeal in the light of the Circular No.O9 l2O2a, dated 17.09.2024, with the liberty to revive the same in case the subject matter of the appeal falls in any of the exr:eptions provided in th€ Circular No.5/2O24 dated 15.03.2t124.
Operative part
Accordrngly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the liberty as prayed for. 2 4\. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stald closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// sd/-K sR+HYt?&ElR SEC N OFFICER To 1 . The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal' Hyderabad Bench '8" Hyderabad' 2. The commissioner of rn"L"1ui tnppeals)-lv,' Hyderabad' rax officer' ward-6(3)' Hvderabad ' ; +il; l;;; -C"'"tel 4. one cc to Mr' J V' P'##:ti'lii"g s. b;""ct to sri R' Raghunandan' Advocate [oPUCl 6. Two CD CoPies IOPUC] for lncome Tax Department kam w HIGH COURT DATED:0610112025 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.32 ot 2012 ,-_:t*_- rE STet :r\^:\ .< J J 1! Ffi :fi ( z a -b. * {),-- S - j.'ir'.\i -',1 \ THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN gcoPkA ft"
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordrngly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Tax Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.