Sri. Alluri Venkata Satyanarayana Raju v. The Commissioner and lnspector
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.5 in passing the refusal order vide No. 2112025 dated 03.03.2025 in furtherance of the letter No. vide Lr. No. E11447812024 dated 21/O112025in respect of plot No.144 admeasuring 400 Sq yds or 335 Sq lVtrs in Sy No.36/24 situated at Vinayak nagar Colony, Gopanpally village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in the prohibitory list U / s 22 (A) of Registration Act as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the Respondent No 5 to register and release the Sale Deed vide Pending Document No. P-45112024 dated 2911012024 without reference to letter No. vide Lr. No. E11447812024 dated 21'01-2025. IA NO: 1 0F 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.5 to register and release the Sale Deed vide pending document No. P-45112024 dated 29.10.2024 in respect of Plot No.144 admeasuring 400 Sq yds or 335 Sq t\/trs in Sy No.36/24 situated at Vinayak nagar Colony, Gopanpally village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ESLAVATH RAJU Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. S. SRAVANTHI, AGP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.8277 OF 2o25 THE 2OTII DAY OF JANUARY 2026 Between: Sri Alluri Venkata Satyanarayana. ...Petitioner
AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Stamps and Registration and others. ...Respondents
ORDER:
Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Smt. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for respondents and perused the material on recor,d.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.No.8277 of 2025 dated 19.03.2025, the respondent authorities have registered the subject document. a\) Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that pending the writ petition, the respondent authorities have I I '2 issued a fresh Notification under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, on 12.11.2025 and in view of the same, the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and requested to closr: the writ petition with liberty to challenge the said proceedings before the appropriate authorities
Recording the aforementioned submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is closed granting liberty as sought for.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this writ petition, sha, ll stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. To SD/. A.H.;GOWRI SHANKAR AS ISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER
One CC to SRI ESLAVATH RAJU, Advocate [OPU 2. Two CCs to GP for Stamps and Registration, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
Two CD Copies \ v IVP I HIGH COUR DATED:2010112026 {il sie ,i: c o 0 / ttB 2[26 * I I ) * .,/ ORDER WP.No.8277 of 2025 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ W
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.