CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITITONFS) No. 61 of 2008 · Chhattisgarh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as witfl<bawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Leamed coimsel appeariag for the petitioner, on instructictti, seeks pemrission of this Court to withdraw this petition, to which leamed counsel appearing for the State has no objection. It is ordered accotdingjy. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as witfl<bawn. No order
Judgment
(WMT PETmON UNDHt ARTICLE 226 OF THE C(»ISTTTUT[ONOF1NDIA) <SB; flan'Me Mr. Satish K. Anrihotri. J.) Presetrt : ShriAnupMajumdar. AdvocateforlhepetitiQnffl-. Shri A.S. Kaehhwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State. A (Passedonthis04tl'of Mareh,20(W) ORALORDER
Operative part
Leamed coimsel appeariag for the petitioner, on instructictti, seeks pemrission of this Court to withdraw this petition, to which leamed counsel appearing for the State has no objection. It is ordered accotdingjy. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as witfl<bawn. No order
astocosts.
Interimreliefgrairiedearliffl-rtandsdischarged. /s-b5r'>-. .. A-'"Y:'""" :" \\ ^-_^--~:7^_^1i?iamif'i>f.-.;-..-__-__--; ••-'• •• • . - • . . ___ '_-:; : """••-.^^^-^ i Sdm fWVf
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as witfl<bawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.