Uday Shankar Sao v. The State Of Bihar
Judgment
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Srivastava For the Respondents : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, AC to A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 09-10-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
#2. For the relief prayed for in the writ petition, i.e. to look into the validity or otherwise of the appointment of Respondent no.7 as Mamta Worker, petitioner has representation dated 26.7.2012 before the District Magistrate, Gopalganj, Annexure-8.
#3. Let District Magistrate, Gopalganj consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.7.2012, Annexure-8 in 2 Patna High Court CWJC No.18850 of 2012 (2) dt.09-10-2012 accordance with law within a reasonable time, not exceeding three months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order before the District Magistrate, Gopalganj.
#4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/- (V.N. Sinha, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.