✦ Patna High Court

Mrs. Radha Rani Singh v. Government Of Bihar, Patna

CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 308 of 2012V N SINHA2 min read

Judgment

For the Respondents : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, AC to GP-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER 4 14-09-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2.

By filing this writ petition, prayer has been made to direct the State- respondents as also the Zila Parishad, Banka to restore the possession of Thakur Pratap Narayan Deo Charitable Hospital, Bhausi to the petitioner in the light of the contents of the indenture dated 7.9.1914, Annexure-1 to the writ petition. In this connection, petitioner invited the attention of the authorities by filing several representations, which were addressed to the District Magistrate and Deputy Development Commissioner, Banka, copy 2 Patna High Court CWJC No.308 of 2012 (4) dt.14-09-2012 whereof is contained in the writ petition, but in spite of notice issued by this Court, the authorities of Zila Parishad, Banka have not chosen to respond to the request made by the petitioner for restoration of the possession of Thakur Pratap Narayan Deo Charitable Hospital, Bhausi to her.

3.

As the Respondent- authorities of the Zila Parishad, Banka are not even appearing in the matter, I have no option, but to direct Zila Parishad, Bank through the Deputy Development Commissioner, Banka to consider the request of the petitioner contained in her representations dated 26.4.2011 and 22.6.2011, Annexures-4 and 5 in the light of the contents of the indenture dated 7.9.1914, Annexure-1 within a reasonable time, not exceeding one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order before the Deputy Development Commissioner, Banka. In case, the Zila Parishad is not inclined to restore the possession of Thakur Pratap Narayan Deo Charitable Hospital, Bhausi to the petitioner, the Deputy Development Commissioner, Banka should pass reasoned order within the same time.

4.

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/- (V.N. Sinha, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 308 of 2012). ← Search more judgments