Shiva Tripathi & Anr. v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAJEEV SINGH
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial 2 A482 No. 10761 of 2025 court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence…
Judgment
Sri Anil Kumar, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the impugned Charge sheet dated 01.09.2014, bearing no. 113 of 2014, Under Section-323,504,506, I.P.C. Police Station-Patti, District Pratapgarh, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case no. 21797 of 2021 (State of U.P. versus Shiva Tripathi and Others), pending before Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Room No. 15, Pratapgarh. "
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.3 to the application.
Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.
Operative part
Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial 2 A482 No. 10761 of 2025 court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 18, 2025 Arpan (Rajeev Singh,J.) ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.