✦ Rajasthan High Court

Anandi Lal v. State of Raj

S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 8075 of 2009MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn but liberty is

Judgment

Operative part

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Govind Chaudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Shrimal, Public Prosecutor. --- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. At this stage, Mr.Govind Chaudhary, learned counsel for the accused petitioner wants to withdraw this bail application with liberty to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate. The Public Prosecutor opposed this prayer. The bail application filed by the accused petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn but liberty is granted to the accused petitioner to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 8075 of 2009). ← Search more judgments