Cwp No. 12115 of 2025 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 ss. 51, 175
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition; accordingly, he may be permitted to do so.
- Para 33. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ***** HARSH BUNGER J. (Oral) 1 Petition herein is, inter alia, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the official respondents to take appropriate action against respondent No.6 in terms of Sections 51 and 175 of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.
#2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition; accordingly, he may be permitted to do so.
#3. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
#4. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed.
28.01.2026 (HARSH BUNGER) JUDGE ANKIT 2026.01.30 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 — ss. 51, 175.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 28 Jan 2026. The bench was HARSH BUNGER.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.