Poonam Sharma v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Judgment
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA PRESENT: Shri D.S.Pheruman, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). Notice of motion to the respondents. On the asking of Court, Shri Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to respondent No.2, Amritsar Improvement Trust to execute the agreement in favour of the petitioner for the transfer of the plot bearing No.E/242, situated on the Ajnala Road Area Expansion Scheme, Amritsar, being a locally displaced person. The petitioner in this regard relies upon a judgment of the Division Bench dated May 8,2006 passed in LPA No.751 of 1992 (Annexure P.11). CWP NO.18978 of 2006 -2- After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the averments made in the present petition, we dispose of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and comprehensive representation before the Improvement Trust, Amritsar, respondent No.2, appending all the relevant documents and also the copy of judgment Annexure P.11 within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner, then respondent No.2 Trust shall take a final decision thereupon within a further period of four months of the filing of the said representation, by passing a detailed and speaking order and take such further action, as may be required, in accordance with law. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (Viney Mittal) Judge November 30, 2006 KD (H.S. Bhalla) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.