✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 21 Dec 2006

Nitranjan & Ors. v. Ch. Devi Lal University, Sirsa & Anr.

M M S BEDI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

In view of the aforesaid fact, the writ petition is disposed of as

Judgment

Operative part

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 13069 of 2005 Date of Decision: December 21, 2006 Nitranjan and others Vs. …..Petitioners Ch. Devi Lal University, Sirsa and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. Present:- Mr. R.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.L. Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. -.- VINEY MITTAL, J. (ORAL) At the outset, Mr. B.L. Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent University states that a regular selection process has already been initiated by the respondents and it has also been decided by the University that the services of the petitioners shall not be dispensed with till the completion of the present academic session i.e. 2006-2007 or till the new selectees join, whichever is earlier. Mr. Gupta further states that the C.W.P. No. 13069 of 2005 [2] University has also decided that no fresh contract/ guest employee shall be taken in place of the present petitioners. The aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents fully satisfies Mr.R.K. Malik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. In view of the aforesaid fact, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (VINEY MITTAL) JUDGE December 21, 2006 sanjay (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the aforesaid fact, the writ petition is disposed of as

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 21 Dec 2006. The bench was M M S BEDI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments