Anita Rani v. The State of Haryana & Ors.
Judgment
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA PRESENT: Shri Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). After arguing the case for some time and after realising that the petitioner at no stage applied for allotment of a plot under the oustee’s quota, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as aforesaid. (Viney Mittal) Judge August 31,2006 KD (H.S. Bhalla) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments