Joginder Singh Rathee v. Haryana Urban Development Authority & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The present petition is disposed of accordingly
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT: Shri J.P.Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). Notice of motion to the respondents. On the asking of Court, Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents. On November 29,2006, the Chief Administrator, HUDA, Panchkula had appeared before us in connection with hearing of CWP No.15433 of 2006 and other connected matters and had made a detailed statement. On the basis of the aforesaid statement, a large number of cases were disposed of. In view of the orders passed in CWP No.15433 of 2006, no further orders are required to be passed in the present case. The present petition is disposed of accordingly. CWP NO.20318 of 2006 -2- A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. December 21, 2006 KD (Viney Mittal) Judge (M.M.S. Bedi) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The present petition is disposed of accordingly
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 21 Dec 2006. The bench was VINEY MITTAL, M M S BEDI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.