✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 19 Oct 2006

Shefali Aggarwal v. Punjab Technical University & Ors.

H S BHALLA

Judgment

CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA PRESENT: Shri Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 and 2 only. On the asking of Court, Shri Ashish Rawal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Shri Anupam Gupta, Advocate for the said respondents. Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to the respondents to issue a no objection certificate for migration to the Institute of Engineering and Technology Bhaddal, District Ropar to the petitioner, affiliated with the respondent Punjab Technical University. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the averments made by her in the present CWP NO.16661 of 2006 -2- petition, we find that for redressal of her grievances, the petitioner has already issued a legal notice (Annexure P.9) dated September 21,

2006. We further find that University has already initiated proceedings on the aforesaid legal notice through a communication dated September 26, 2006 (Annexure P.10) when some information has been sought from GGS College of Modern Technology, Ludhiana Road, Kharar, respondent No.3. In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondent Punjab Technical University to take a final decision on the claim made by the petitioner within a period of one month from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order and take such further appropriate action, as may be required, in accordance with law. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. October 19, 2006 KD (Viney Mittal) Judge (H.S. Bhalla) Judge

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments