Monu v. State of Haryana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
maintain the parity with Court, the present petition is allowed
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Sanjeev Kadian, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to the order passed in respect of co-accused, who has been granted concession of bail by this Court on 23.9.2011. In the earlier order passed by this Court, it has been noticed that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as the husband of the complainant was representing the company, in which the petitioner had made investment on large scale and on demand of the money being so raised, this false case has been lodged against the petitioner. Without commenting on the merits and in order to maintain the parity with Court, the present petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Panipat. January 13, 2012 monika ( RANJIT SINGH ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: maintain the parity with Court, the present petition is allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 13 Jan 2012. The bench was RANJIT SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.