The High Court · 2012
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr.Mandeep S. Sachdev, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Arjun Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties have agreed that they shall have no objection, if the present petition is allowed to be withdrawn with a direction to the learned trial Court not to consider the findings given in order dated 30.9.2010 with regard to dismissal of application under Section 91, Cr. P.C. at the time of final arguments. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
12.1.2012 Mks (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 91.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 12 Jan 2012. The bench was NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.