✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 24 Jul 2012

Chandigarh v. NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Crl. Misc. No.M-21816 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 24.07.2012 Alka Sharma and another Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others. CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI. Respondents. Present: - Mr.Bhupinder Ghai, Advocate, for the petitioners. NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J. Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C., is for the issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect lives and liberty of the petitioners from respondents No. 4 to 10. The petitioners contend that they being major, have solemnized their marriage in accordance with law. They further submit that the private respondents are not accepting the marriage of the petitioners and adamant to separate them from each other by resorting to illegal means. They further submit that in view of the imminent danger to their lives and liberty they have already moved a representation (Annexure P-5) before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna. Crl. Misc. No.M-21816 of 2012 (O&M) 2 Keeping in view the seriousness of the matter but without going into the validity of the marriage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna, to take action as warranted by law on the representation moved by the petitioners and in the meantime to issue necessary orders to ensure that no harm is caused to the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents.

24.07.2012 Anoop (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 24 Jul 2012. The bench was NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments