✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 16 Oct 2012

Ajay Kumar v. State of Punjab

NARESH KUMAR, NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

case, the present application is allowed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI. Present: - Mr.Saravpreet Gurna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Shilesh Gupta, Addl.A.G. Punjab. NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to petitioner Ajay Kumar son of Sadhu Ram, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel contends that the main accused has already been granted the benefit of bail by the learned trial court. He submits that only allegation against the petitioner is that he took the money from the complainant and converted the same into dollars. Crl. Misc. No.M- 28903 of 2012 (O&M). 2 Learned counsel for the State has not controverted the factual aspects raised by learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is behind the bars from 16.07.2012. The main accused has already been granted bail by the learned court below. Without commenting much on the merits of the case, the present application is allowed. Petitioner Ajay Kumar son of Sadhu Ram, resident of Fauji Colony, Village Barara, District Ambala, is ordered to be released on bail during the pendency of the trial subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Ludhiana.

16.10.2012 Anoop (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: case, the present application is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 16 Oct 2012. The bench was NARESH KUMAR, NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments