Ajay Kumar v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
case, the present application is allowed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI. Present: - Mr.Saravpreet Gurna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Shilesh Gupta, Addl.A.G. Punjab. NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to petitioner Ajay Kumar son of Sadhu Ram, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel contends that the main accused has already been granted the benefit of bail by the learned trial court. He submits that only allegation against the petitioner is that he took the money from the complainant and converted the same into dollars. Crl. Misc. No.M- 28903 of 2012 (O&M). 2 Learned counsel for the State has not controverted the factual aspects raised by learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is behind the bars from 16.07.2012. The main accused has already been granted bail by the learned court below. Without commenting much on the merits of the case, the present application is allowed. Petitioner Ajay Kumar son of Sadhu Ram, resident of Fauji Colony, Village Barara, District Ambala, is ordered to be released on bail during the pendency of the trial subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Ludhiana.
16.10.2012 Anoop (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: case, the present application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 16 Oct 2012. The bench was NARESH KUMAR, NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.