✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 19 Sep 2011

Ravinder Singh & Ors. v. The State of Punjab & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 303 of 1997SURYA KANT

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of in terms

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners who are working as Pump Operators/…

Judgment

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.-

Operative part

1.

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners who are working as Pump Operators/ Electricians in the P.W.D. (Public Health), Government of Punjab, seek a mandamus for the grant of the revised pay scales recommended by various Pay Commissions with regard to skilled and semi-skilled staff in the services of the Punjab Government. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by this Court in favour of the petitioners vide a decision rendered in L.P.A.No.44 of 2009 (State of Punjab and others versus Rajinder Pal Gauttam and others) as well as the subsequent decisions given by various Benches CWP No.303 of 1997 [2] including dated 4.3.2011 rendered in Civil Writ Petition No.3820 of 2011 (Bitu Ram and others versus State of Punjab and others) granting somewhat similar reliefs. The SLP filed against the order passed in LPA No.44 of 2009 has also been dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 12.7.2010. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid decisions in Rajinder Pal Gautam's case (supra) and Bitu Ram and others' case (supra). Dasti. September 19, 2011 Mohinder (SURYA KANT) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of in terms

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 19 Sep 2011. The bench was SURYA KANT.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 303 of 1997). ← Search more judgments