Civil Application No. 3329 of 2026 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed interms of prayer clause ‘B’.
Judgment
1 924 CA 3329-2026.odtIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3329 OF 2026IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11232 OF 2024WITHWRIT PETITION NO. 11232 OF 2024RATNAMALA GULABRAO CHAVADEVERSUSTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS…Mr. Y.L. Bidve – Advocate for ApplicantMs. R.P. Gaur – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 6, StateMr. Pallav Sinha h/f. Mr. S.V. Adwant – Advocate for Respondent No.7…CORAM: N. B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ.DATE:24.04.2026PER COURT :
Heard.
By way of present Civil Application the applicant seeks amendmentin the writ petition.
Learned advocate appearing for respondent No.7 opposes theapplication on the ground that writ petition is pending for admission.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed interms of prayer clause ‘B’.
Amendment be carried out within a period of two (2) weeks fromtoday.
Amended copy be served on the other side.
List the Writ Petition No. 11232 Of 2024 on 03.07.2026 for filingreply. [ VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J. ] [ N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J. ]Pooja Kale/
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.