IN FCAST/9554/2025 v. AMIT SHIRISH PARALKAR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The application is allowed and delay is condoned
Key paragraphs
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3445 OF 2025
IN FCAST/9554/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3446 OF 2025
IN FCAST/9554/2025 SHWETA AMIT PARALKAR @ SHWETA RAMESH WARADE
VERSUS
AMIT SHIRISH PARALKAR ... Advocate for Applicant :
Mr. Ravindra B. Ade Advocate for Respondent : Mr/ S. S. Kulkarni
CORAM : ... NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATED : 11th JULY, 2025
ORDER:-
This application is filed for condonation of 96 days’ delay in filing the Family Court Appeal.
Learned Advocate for the respondent has vehemently opposed the application stating that, no plausible cause is given for condonation of delay.
For the reasons stated in the application, and as the petition is decided ex-parte by the Family Court, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay.
Operative part
The application is allowed and delay is condoned. Appeal be registered. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ) JUDGE YSK JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is allowed and delay is condoned
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 11 Jul 2025. The bench was B SURYAWANSHI, SANDIPKUMAR C MORE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.