IN CP/737/2016 v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘C’. Amendment to be carried out during the course of the day. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13826 OF 2025 IN CP/737/2016 VASANTRAO PURUSHOTTAM MANDE (DIED) THROUGH LRS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY EDUCATION AND OTHERS ... Mr. Mahesh R. Sonwane, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. Prashant R. Nangare, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 And 5. ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2025 PER COURT :
Leave is granted to substitute name of respondent Nos.4 and 5. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘C’. Amendment to be carried out during the course of the day. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.)
(NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.