✦ Allahabad High Court

Sunil Bajaj v. Master Vivan Bajaj Thru. His Mother

ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL No. 22 of 2024RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI

Judgment

1.

Heard Sri Sunil Bajaj, the appellant who appeared in person, though his Advocate Sri Vaibhav Upadhyay is not present.

2.

Sri Sunil Bajaj-appellant has stated that the learned counsel for the respondents has not appeared, however, notice has already been served upon them. He has pressed the urgency in the matter and submitted that in compliance of the order of this Court, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court but on account of non-cooperation of the respondents, mediation could not be successful.

3.

Considering the submission of Sri Sunil Bajaj-appellant, list this case on 14.10.2025. This matter may be taken at 3.45 PM in the first round as this matter may not be adjourned on the next date. The appellant may intimate this order to the learned counsel for the respondents in writing and the receipt thereof may be shown to the Court on the next date. In the meantime, if the learned counsel for the respondents is willing to file objection/counter affidavit, the same may be filed. September 24, 2025 Arun (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL No. 22 of 2024). ← Search more judgments