Santanu Kumar Mohapatra v. Arvind Agrawal, IAS & Anr.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsel for the Parties, this Contempt Petition is disposed of by granting one month further time to the Opp. Parties- Contemnors to comply with the order passed on 27.03.2025. However, if the…
Judgment
Petitioner Mr. S. Jena, Adv. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY CORAM: ORDER 29.11.2025 Order No. 01
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
This Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner for non- compliance of the order dated 27.03.2025 passed by this Court in F.A.O. No. 678 of 2019.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsel for the Parties, this Contempt Petition is disposed of by granting one month further time to the Opp. Parties- Contemnors to comply with the order passed on 27.03.2025. However, if the order is not complied with within the extended time, it will be held as deliberate violation of this Court’s order. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 01-Dec-2025 11:00:18 Page 1 of 1.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.