Balabhadra Pradhan v. State of Odisha & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Jyoti (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 02-Sep-2025 18:29:22 Page 2 of 2.
Judgment
Petitioner Mr. S. Routray, Adv. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY CORAM: ORDER 02.09.2025 Order No. 01
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:-
It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Admit the writ application. Call for the record. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ/writs, direction/directions directing the Opp.parties to regularize the service of the petitioner against the post of Attendant and further extend all the consequential service and financial benefits in favour of the petitioner as due and admissible within a stipulated time to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court. And/or order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper for the ends of justice. And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.
Page 1 of 2.
However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.3 be communicated to the Petitioner.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Jyoti (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 02-Sep-2025 18:29:22 Page 2 of 2.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.