✦ Orissa High Court

Ratnakar Ghadei & Ors. v. State of Odisha & Ors.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C)(OAC) No. 2455 of 2014BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 02-Sep-2023 14:01:09

Judgment

Petitioners Mr. B.R. Barick, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Rath, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 31.08.2023 Order No

05.

1. This matter taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioners have filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:-

i) Direct the Respondents to issue the order in favour of the Applicants in modifying the resolution dt.04.05.2013 under Annexure-6 as regular Primary School teacher at par with the courterpart SSS (Para Teacher) engaged under Zillaparishad have been regularised since 01.04.2008 under Annexure-3 by taking into account the past service of Applicants rendered as SSS (Para Teacher) since 2001 towards seniority and pensionary benefits within a time to be stipulated by this Hon’ble Tribunal. And pass such other order(s) as may be deemed fit and proper for the interest of justice.

4.

However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioners to make a detailed representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant // 2 // documents and citations in support of their claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioners.

6.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 02-Sep-2023 14:01:09

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C)(OAC) No. 2455 of 2014). ← Search more judgments