Himanshu Sekhar Mishra v. State of Odisha
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 0101. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this case no first information report has been lodged. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that relying on the paper…
Judgment
Mr.B.P. Satpathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opp. Party Mr.D.K. Pani, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No. ORDER 05.01.2022
This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this case no first information report has been lodged. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that relying on the paper publication in the daily news paper ‘Nirbhaya’ and ‘Sakala’ dated 23.11.2021 vide Annexure-7 series, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest. Since no F.I.R. has been registered, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for anticipatory bail after formal registration of the F.I.R. The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly. Judge ( S.K. Sahoo) PKSahoo // 2 //
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.