Laxmidhar Parida v. State of Odisha
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 294, 323, 341, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 0202. This matter taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Nimapara P.S Case…
Judgment
Mr.S.N. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opp. Party Mr.J.P. Patra, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No. ORDER
30.03.2022
This matter taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Nimapara P.S Case No. 62 of 2022 corresponding to G.R.Case No. 179 of 2022 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Nimapara for alleged commission of offences under sections 341, 294, 323, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Perused the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory // 2 // bail application. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the offences are triable by Magistrate and the offence under section 506 of the Indian Penal Code is the only non-bailable offence and on hearing the learned counsel for the State who submitted that the informant has sustained two head injuries and both the injuries have been opined to be simple in nature, I am inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing any facts to the Courts or to the Investigating Officer. Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. // 3 // Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. Judge ( S.K. Sahoo) P
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.