Parthasarathi Mohanty @ v. State of Odisha
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 41A, 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 294, 323, 354, 451, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 0101. This matter taken up through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Boudh P.S. Case No.312 of 2021…
Judgment
Mr.B.P. Pradhan, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opp. Party Mr. A.K. Beuera, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No. ORDER 24.01.2022
This matter taken up through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Boudh P.S. Case No.312 of 2021 corresponding to C.T. Case No.546 of 2021 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Boudh for alleged commission of offences under sections 294, 451, 323, 506, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Perused the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory bail application. Learned counsel for the State on verification of // 2 // records submitted that notice as contemplated under section 41A of Cr.P.C. has been issued to the petitioner and he has complied with the terms of the notice and therefore, there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner in connection with this case. In view of such submission, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed vide office order dated 7th January 2022. Judge ( S.K. Sahoo) PKSahoo
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 41A, 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 294, 323, 354, 451, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Orissa High Court, on 07 Jan 2022. The bench was S K SAHOO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.