✦ Orissa High Court

Mr. M.K. Pati. S.P.C v. Union of India & Ors.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P(C) No. 28623 of 2025DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD, CHITTARANJAN DASH

Case at a glance

Bench
DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD, CHITTARANJAN DASH

Outcome

Disposed of

The Writ Petitions are disposed off

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Similar cases should be treated alike being the cardinal principle of adjudication, these cases also need to be decided in terms of cognate decision. Ordered accordingly. The Writ Petitions are disposed off. (Dixit Krishna Shripad) Judge (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Bijay/Sarbani Signature Not Verified Digitally…

Judgment

Mr. M.K. Pati. S.P.C. Sidda Gopaludu …. Opposite Party -versus- Mr. Swapna Kumar Ojha, Advocate W.P(C) No. 28641 of 2025 Union of India & others …. Petitioners Mr. M.K. Pati. S.P.C. V. Ramesh & others …. Opposite Parties -versus- Mr. Swapna Kumar Ojha, Advocate W.P(C) No. 28932 of 2025 Union of India & others …. Petitioners Mr. M.K. Pati. S.P.C. Netra Mani Nanda & Others …. Opposite Parties -versus- Mr. Swapna Kumar Ojha, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 13.01.2026

04.

The subject matter of these Petitions is substantially similar to the one in W.P.(C) No.35395 of 2025, between Union of India and others v. Satyabrata Dhupal and others heard and disposed off by this Court vide order dated

12.01.2026, wherein the operative portion of the order reads as under: “In the above circumstances, this petition being devoid of merits is liable to be dismissed and accordingly it is. The order of the CAT, Cuttack is to be acted upon by the Opposite Parties within eight (8) weeks.”

Operative part

2.

Similar cases should be treated alike being the cardinal principle of adjudication, these cases also need to be decided in terms of cognate decision. Ordered accordingly. The Writ Petitions are disposed off. (Dixit Krishna Shripad) Judge (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Bijay/Sarbani Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SARBANI DASH Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 15-Jan-2026 19:34:21

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P(C) No. 28623 of 2025). ← Search more judgments