✦ Orissa High Court

Susanta Kumar Sahoo v. State of Odisha & Ors.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.A No. 89 of 2016S MURALIDHAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

The writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Chief Justice (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Judge (Chittaranjan Dash) KC Bisoi

Judgment

Appellant Mr. D. N. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Respondents Mr. D.K. Mohanty, AGA CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 28.09.2022

1.

Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the matter has been rendered infructuous.

Operative part

2.

The writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Chief Justice (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Judge (Chittaranjan Dash) KC Bisoi

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.A No. 89 of 2016). ← Search more judgments