✦ Orissa High Court

Dhiren Kumar Pani & Ors. v. Satyananda Patra, Sub Registrar, Dhamnagar

ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No. 5596 of 2022K R MOHAPATRA

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. This CONTC has been filed alleging noncompliance of order dated 20.06.2022 by which W.P.(C) No.9129 of 2022 is disposed of with the following direction:- xxx xxx. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the requirement under Section 35…
  • Para 66. Accordingly, the CONTC is dropped. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge Himansu Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 14-Jul-2025 19:00:21

Judgment

Mr.Sabita Ranjan Pattnaik, (Additional Government Advocate) CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA Order No. ORDER 11.07.2025

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

None appears for the Petitioners at the time of call.

3.

This CONTC has been filed alleging noncompliance of order dated 20.06.2022 by which W.P.(C) No.9129 of 2022 is disposed of with the following direction:-

xxx xxx. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the requirement under Section 35 of the Act read with Rules 63 and 64 of the Rules, this Court is of the considered opinion that the concerned Sub-Registrar is obliged under law to make an inquiry as stated above before registration of the deed, if any, executed by Opposite Party No.4, if an application/objection is filed to that effect. Mr.Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioners undertakes to produce the certified copy of this order before the Sub-Registrar, Dhamnagar to do the needful in accordance with law.

4.

Mr.Pattnaik, learned Additional Government Advocate, on instruction, submits that no sale deed executed by Opposite Party No.4, namely, Sri Braja Sunder Pani is received till date. Thus, question of raising objection to execution of such sale deed does not arise.

5.

In view of the above, this Court feels that no contempt is made out, as alleged.

6.

Accordingly, the CONTC is dropped. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge Himansu Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 14-Jul-2025 19:00:21

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No. 5596 of 2022). ← Search more judgments