Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK v. State of Odisha & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the submission made and the documents filed, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Judgment
Mr. Saswat Jena, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA ORDER 07.10.2024 Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Petitioner in this writ petition prays for a direction to release the seized building, i.e., 1st and 2nd floor situated over Plot No.1249, Khata No.1103, mouza-Panisalia in the district of Jagatsinghpur, which was seized by the Opposite Parties, namely, Chief District Medical Officer, Jagatsinghpur-Opposite Party No.4 under the provisions of Clinical Establishment (R & C) Act,
Mr. Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel, on instruction, submits that the property in question has already been released in favour of the Petitioner on 4th October, 2024.
Written instruction filed by Mr. Mishra, leaned Additional Standing Counsel is taken on record.
Operative part
In view of the submission made and the documents filed, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
As requested, a copy of this order be made over to Mr. Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel for communication. Rojalin (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.